Legitimacy, Pragmatism and Digital Technology
Technologies have a normative dimension. That is by now a well-known insight from STS and neighbouring fields. Especially the ongoing and ubiquitous digitalization, however, raises ever new questions. Especially in terms of the legitimacy of technological normativity. Algorithms are being utilized in a diverse set of social institutions ranging from our media system to courts or the welfare state.
In a small workshop which took place on 14 January 2025, an interdisciplinary group of scholars at ENS discussed theoretical foundations of legitimacy and how to apply them on digital technologies. Specifically, they explored pragmatist approaches to bridging normative and empirical perspectives of legitimacy. The workshop thereby tried to navigate the long-going debate between normative theories, such as Rawls or Habermas, and anti-foundationalist and empirical oriented understandings of legitimacy. During the debate, the group also discussed the applicability and differences of such an understanding to the ongoing debate about Responsible and Ethical AI. Because, in the end, raising the issue of legitimacy does not only deal with the question whether a normative account in itself is acceptable, but also who has the power to define the rules of the game. This becomes especially important in the ongoing endeavors of big tech companies to define - and therefore also limit - accountable and responsible AI frameworks. The workshop was a first start to this debate at ENS and will be continued in future discussions.
Participants: Prof. Dr. Miglė Bareikytė, Dr. Lukasz Duleba, Agnieszka Patecka, Dr. Nikolaus Poechhacker